<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Human Costs of Climate Change</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ecology.com/ecology-today/2008/11/20/human-costs-of-climate-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ecology.com/ecology-today/2008/11/20/human-costs-of-climate-change/</link>
	<description>Ecology News, Information and Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:38:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: megreenyou</title>
		<link>http://ecology.com/ecology-today/2008/11/20/human-costs-of-climate-change/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>megreenyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ecology.com/ecology-today/?p=431#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Global warming may reduce biodiversity as the distribution of species and their populations may shift towards the poles and higher altitudes, leaving those endemic to arctic and high mountain regions vulnerable.  In addition, changes in the ranges of disease spreading species (aka vector species) may exacerbate the spread of disease among humans and other species such as malaria.

 
            Actions to address the impacts of climate change may be beneficial or harmful to biodiversity.  Carbon sequestration initiatives designed to mitigate impacts of greenhouse gases may lead to adverse impacts on biodiversity by creating monoculture forestry.  Avoiding deforestation through forest conservation projects may be beneficial for climate change mitigation, forest biodiversity conservation, reducing desertification and improving economic functions.  Climate change will also affect biodiversity conservation strategies.  One half of the protected areas will shift from one climate zone to another and the effects will be very pronounced at higher latitudes and altitudes.  Adjustment of protected area boundaries will need to occur to achieve stated conservation goals.
Global warming and its impact on biodiversity are discussed at http://www.onebiosphere.com  
            The relationship between energy production and biodiversity has been affected by policy responses in recent decades such as the promotion of organic farming and the reduction in agricultural nitrogen use.  Obtaining governmental commitments has been challenging due to problems in securing financing and lack of political will or vision.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global warming may reduce biodiversity as the distribution of species and their populations may shift towards the poles and higher altitudes, leaving those endemic to arctic and high mountain regions vulnerable.  In addition, changes in the ranges of disease spreading species (aka vector species) may exacerbate the spread of disease among humans and other species such as malaria.</p>
<p>            Actions to address the impacts of climate change may be beneficial or harmful to biodiversity.  Carbon sequestration initiatives designed to mitigate impacts of greenhouse gases may lead to adverse impacts on biodiversity by creating monoculture forestry.  Avoiding deforestation through forest conservation projects may be beneficial for climate change mitigation, forest biodiversity conservation, reducing desertification and improving economic functions.  Climate change will also affect biodiversity conservation strategies.  One half of the protected areas will shift from one climate zone to another and the effects will be very pronounced at higher latitudes and altitudes.  Adjustment of protected area boundaries will need to occur to achieve stated conservation goals.<br />
Global warming and its impact on biodiversity are discussed at <a href="http://www.onebiosphere.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.onebiosphere.com</a><br />
            The relationship between energy production and biodiversity has been affected by policy responses in recent decades such as the promotion of organic farming and the reduction in agricultural nitrogen use.  Obtaining governmental commitments has been challenging due to problems in securing financing and lack of political will or vision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
